Can a Lawyer Defend a Relative

Can a Lawyer Defend a Relative | Step By Step Guide

It happens regularly. A person requires legal advice for any purpose and, owing to financial restraints, seeks a member of the family who is also a lawyer. Courts hardly ever intrude with a family plaintiff’s rights of choosing his or her own lawyer or lawyer’s choice to represent himself or herself. 

It’s possible since lawyers are allowed to defend their families. It is, however, maybe not a smart option. Lawyers have a strong commitment to representing people in an equitable and unbiased approach. Before signing with a client with whom they have any personal attachment, every lawyer should ponder over potential emotional conflicts.

When a lawyer gets emotionally involved in a case, his or her ability to provide impartial and effective advice may be harmed. So it can’t be denied that lawyers face serious problems regarding defending their relatives. 

The adverse impacts of defending a relative

There are undoubtedly many drawbacks to defending your family members or close ones.  If you defend a relative and they lose their case, you may find yourself out of favor with the rest of the family for a long time. Can your links to this individual have an impact on how you can go about your daily routines? Are you able to control your emotions and move sensibly and equitably to have the finest possible conclusion? You must evaluate logically if the consequences of defending your family exceed the benefits.

Even though the rules and regulations don’t directly prohibit you from acting, you may be denied insurance coverage when you do – which is a powerful incentive to say “no” in certain situations. Most insurance policies will not protect you if you are defending a close relative. You won’t be accepted if the payment has direct or indirect benefits to you, your family, or your law company as a result of your wrongdoing.

A partner (along with a common-law spouse), kids, siblings, and parents are all considered family members. So, if you resolve your father’s personal injury claim and he then sues you for professional carelessness for mismanaging the case, the assertion against you will be dismissed since the payment will advantage your father straightforwardly.

These insurance advantages are for claims “filed by or in relation with a commercial operation or company” in which you, your spouse, or firm associates hold more than 10% – the “business exclusion.” This implies that any claim originating from the services you offer to Banana B Company or Orange O Company would be rejected if you and your spouse hold all of Apple A Company’s shares, which possesses 50% of Banana B Company’s shares that owns 25% of Orange O Company’s shares.

The concept behind the “business restriction” is that a careless lawyer should not gain inadvertently from their fault – as seems to be the case if, for instance, benefits included their spouse., that insurance essentially expands this to include personal and commercial issues for close family members.

But on the other hand, because of the intimacy of the relationship, working for a friend or family is apt to be less professional than acting for an ordinary client, so you are more prone to skip some stages. You are not authorized to enter a file, do a conflict analysis, sign a rental contract, or receive and confirm detailed instructions, all of which you would normally do.

You are also more eager to accept shortcuts when it comes to appropriately preserving the file or delivering correspondence to a client with whom you have a close relationship. This is especially significant when you consider that half of all professional claims of negligence involve a disruption in lawyer-client communication.

And you are more likely to handle the file casually if the relative is not really a fee-paying client than if you are providing a lower charge to a legitimate client. It is easy to assume that you owe your adult daughter the same level of perfectionism that you owe to all of your other clients when you’re assisting her out for free.

Can a Lawyer Defend a Relative

Lawyers must set limits in intense family legal wrangling, and it can be challenging for both parties to detach emotions from reality. Lawyers seldom choose to represent someone with whom they have had a close relationship for a variety of reasons. It is definitely not a good thing if objectivity becomes a problem, as it often does in heated family circumstances.

As a consequence, a lawyer should always consider taking on a family member’s lawsuit. They should never be afraid to say no if they do not have the time or the issue is outside of their expertise. They should keep themselves away from putting themselves in situations where their emotions could take over.

There is always a possibility that their lawyer will undertake their case pro bono or at a reduced cost, based on the relative’s economic situation and the closeness of the relationship. However, be aware that certain relatives may demand their legal expenses to be eliminated just because they are linked. As a result, the lawyer must wish to develop that understanding and make it clear from the start.

What are some of the advantages of working for the family?

If you decide to defend a family member in court, there are a number of benefits to consider.

  • The client you’re representing most certainly has a high level of faith in you; otherwise, they might not have sought you in the first place.
  • Defending family members might aid in the development of your client base. As your practice grows, this might help you gain reputation and confidence.

There is always the possibility that their lawyer will accept their case pro gratis or at a reduced cost, depending on the relative’s financial condition and the closeness of the relationship. However, be aware that certain relatives may demand their legal expenses to be eliminated just because they are linked. As a result, the lawyer must wish to develop that understanding and make it very clear from the start.

Lawyer’s holding of the standard of practice while defending a relative

Lawyer’s holding of the standard of practice while defending a relative

If a legal firm has given the lawyer permission to defend their relative like other clients while adhering to their regular practice rules and regulations, a lawyer should – 

  • Make the interaction formal. Schedule an appointment for his or her relative to visit the office to address the situation. Don’t discuss the case over dessert just like in a family function.
  • Create a file and run your regular potential conflicts of interest analysis.
  • So that the person has reasonable expectations, talk about time periods and probable results.
  • Make sure you have detailed guidelines and keep a complete record of your work.
  • Be honest and straightforward about the case’s chances of succeeding.
  • Tell them the reality about whether their case is likely to be more successful and what will occur if it does not happen. 
  • Maintain open lines of communication and make sure that all parties are on the same page throughout all times to assist in mitigating the impact of potential undesirable consequences. 

Lawyers should avoid putting themselves in conditions where their emotions might take over their professionalism. It’s also crucial, to be honest, and upfront about the merits and prospects for accomplishment. Most lawyers, all too often, seek to satisfy their families and/or avoid upsetting them by presenting them the truth. Every client, including family members, has the right to know if their case is strong or not, as early as possible.

In tough situations, people are sometimes frightened or hesitant to express their views. However, when it comes to a relative, such info is much more confusing. Lawyers are recognized for being straightforward and truthful. They work with facts and prefer to be equipped with “worst-case scenarios.” They have good strategies and are usually unafraid of conflict and confrontation if it is critical to help their client. Dealing with a relative who has turned into a “client” might have serious and long-term negative consequences.

It’s possible that family representation is a full conflict of interest. In less apparent instances, family ties and friendships suffer as a result of this. Do you know anyone in your family who is a photographer? Begin by expressing your support for them. Is there anyone in your family who works in the hotel or restaurant? That is an interesting premise to share. Do you have any acquaintances who work as mechanics? Don’t be afraid to give him work and help him make more money.

For lawyers, though, dealing with outsiders is preferable. They are far more at ease and confident working with strangers than they are with their own family members. They’ll be in a position to offer the greatest service possible and achieve professional success there. Relatives, on the other side, should be respectful of the circumstances and only seek legal advice from members of their own family in order to save their relationships.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *